Advertising & Marketing Services Market Research Report
Samuel Edwards
|
December 23, 2025
1. Executive Summary
The Advertising & Marketing Services sector in 2025 is being reshaped by two parallel growth paths: (1) performance-driven acquisition with strict ROI proof, and (2) brand/attention plays designed to win in a fragmented, video-first media world. Overall demand is still expanding, but at a modest CAGR, forcing agencies and service firms to compete on efficiency, data ownership, and specialization rather than just scale.
Brief overview of industry marketing trends
Digital remains the budget anchor. US digital ad spend reached about $259B in 2024 (+~15% YoY), with Search and Digital Video accounting for most incremental growth.
Video and CTV are now core, not experimental. Digital video spend (including CTV/streaming) grew roughly 16% YoY in 2024; brands want both reach and performance tie-ins.
Agencies are rebuilding around data + AI. Major networks are consolidating and cutting costs to reinvest in automation, identity, and AI-supported delivery (e.g., mega-mergers, platform-led restructures).
Shifts in customer acquisition strategies
From MQL volume → buying-group conversion. B2B buyers increasingly self-educate and then stall unless vendors close late-funnel confidence gaps; Forrester reports 86% of B2B purchases stall, with decision committees driving complexity.
Retention as a growth hedge. With CAC volatility rising, agencies and services firms are investing in lifecycle systems: 64% of marketing leaders are leaning into loyalty rewards and 62% into personalized email.
First-party + partner identity is a competitive moat. Chrome’s latest decision not to fully deprecate third-party cookies removes the deadline pressure, but not the direction: brands and agencies still must win via consented data, clean rooms, and identity graphs.
Summary of performance benchmarks
Cross-industry PPC proxies (2025):
Avg CTR 6.66%
Avg CPC $5.26
Avg CVR 7.52%
Avg CPL $70.11 Agency-vertical reality: “marketing services / agency” keywords often price above these averages due to saturated auctions.
Email benchmarks (B2B proxy):
Open rates ~40–42%
CTR ~2% Email remains the best retention + nurture ROI channel in the sector.
Key takeaways
Growth is steady but not margin-forgiving. The agency/services TAM grows ~3–4% annually, so winners must out-execute peers.
Data, identity, and experimentation speed are the new differentiators. The market is rewarding firms that can prove incremental lift, not just impressions.
Performance and brand are converging around video + creators. CTV/short-form video drive attention; search/retargeting capture demand.
Retention programs are now a frontline acquisition strategy. Lowering churn and expanding LTV is the most reliable CAC hedge.
Chrome cookie phase-out cancelled/paused;
user-choice model maintained
First-party data and identity solutions still win even without a hard cutoff.
Sources: IMARC (global ad market), Business Research Company (agency TAM), IAB (US digital spend & video growth),
Chiefmartec/State of Martech (martech market), Reuters & industry privacy coverage (cookie policy).
2. Market Context & Industry Overview
Total Addressable Market (TAM) and Structure
Global advertising spend (all channels)
Global ad market size in 2024 is estimated at $676.8B, projected to reach $995.0B by 2033 (CAGR ~4.4%). (IMARC Group)
Other analysts place 2024 ad spend slightly higher at $772.4B, reaching about $980.7B by 2030 with a similar ~4.1% CAGR. (MarkNtel Advisors)
Directionally, all major forecasts converge: ad spend grows faster than GDP, but not explosively, implying a competitive, margin-squeezed environment.
Advertising & marketing services / agency TAM
The advertising agencies market (creative, media, digital, full-service shops) is estimated at about $383.6B in 2024, growing to $398.8B in 2025 (CAGR ~3.9%). (The Business Research Company, Research and Markets)
Longer-term, agencies are projected to reach ~$464B by 2029, implying 4–5% CAGR through the decade.(The Business Research Company)
A broader “advertising, PR & related services” bucket (agencies + OOH, media buying firms, PR, etc.) reaches $816.6B in 2024, forecast to $1,008.8B by 2029 (CAGR 4.5%).(The Business Research Company)
Interpretation for the sector
Demand is growing, but steadily—this is not a hypergrowth market. For agencies and marketing services firms, growth comes primarily from share shifts (away from traditional channels, “do-it-yourself” brands, or weaker competitors) rather than new money pouring in.
Consolidation at the top (e.g., Omnicom–IPG merger; WPP’s market-cap decline) shows how scale is being reorganized rather than expanded. (Business Insider, The Guardian, Financial Times)
Growth Rates and 5-Year Trend: Digital vs. Total
To understand the operating context for marketing services, the US digital ad market is the clearest barometer.
USD billions. Year-over-year growth shown where reported.
Year
US Digital Ad Revenue
YoY Growth
Notes
2020
$139.8B
—
Pandemic-era acceleration in ecommerce, streaming, and digital-first acquisition.
2021
$189.3B
+35.4%
Post-COVID rebound; heavy lift from Search and Social performance media.
2022
$209.7B
+10.8%
Growth cooled vs. 2021 but stayed double-digit amid macro uncertainty.
2023
$225.0B
+7.3%
Resilient expansion; retail media and video begin taking larger shares.
2024
$258.6B
+14.9%
Re-acceleration driven by Search, Digital Video/CTV, and Retail Media growth.
Summary: US digital advertising remains the primary growth engine for the broader advertising & marketing services sector,
reaching ~$259B in 2024 and returning to mid-teens YoY growth.
PwC’s Global Entertainment & Media Outlook estimates that digital ad formats already represent ~72% of total ad revenue globally in 2024, expected to reach 80% by 2029. (Reuters)
That implies digital’s share of total advertising is still climbing, even in a mature market.
Implications for agencies & marketing services
Revenue growth at the sector level (3–5% CAGR) lags digital ad growth (high single to low double digits), meaning:
Pricing power is weak unless you own data, proprietary formats, or outcomes.
We can look at digital adoption from two angles: share of marketing budgets and share of advertising revenue.
Digital share of marketing budgets
A 2025 Gartner CMO survey finds that digital channels now account for 61.1% of total marketing spend, with 7 out of 10 industries allocating more than 60% of their budgets to digital. (Gartner)
In vertical-level analyses, digital’s share of ad spend is even higher in practice:
eMarketer estimates that 77.7% of US ad spend in 2024 goes to digital channels, with some industries exceeding that average. (EMARKETER)
For many tech and electronics advertisers, traditional formats make up only ~12.9% of budgets, implying ~87% digital. Retail is similar, with traditional around 17.1%. (EMARKETER)
Digital share of advertising revenue
PwC’s global view: 72% of ad revenue is already digital in 2024, moving to 80% by 2029. (Reuters)
IAB’s US data shows digital ad revenue itself is still growing in double digits, while many traditional channels (print, linear TV, legacy radio) are flat or declining.(iab.com, Marketing Charts)
Takeaway: For agencies and marketing services, this means:
Most growth inside client budgets shows up in digital, data-rich and performance-measurable channels.
Non-digital capabilities (brand strategy, creative, experiential) still matter, but increasingly as enablers or multipliers for digital performance, not as standalone revenue islands.
Marketing Maturity: Early, Maturing, Saturated
We can categorize the industry’s marketing maturity along two axes: region and capability stack.
By region
North America & Western Europe – Saturated / sophisticated
These regions drive the largest share of global ad and digital ad spend, accounting for ~32–33% of the global ad market and over 30% of global digital ad revenue. (IMARC Group, Grand View Research)
Digital formats often exceed 75% of spend, and in some verticals >80%.(EMARKETER, EMARKETER)
Market is saturated in terms of basic digital adoption; competition shifts to AI, identity, measurement, and creative quality.
Asia-Pacific – High growth / maturing
APAC is the fastest-growing regional ad market, with especially strong growth in India, Indonesia, and parts of Southeast Asia driven by mobile and internet advertising. (TV Tech, Reuters)
Many markets are still in the rapid digital penetration phase—room to grow in performance media, retail media and social commerce.
For agencies, this is where net-new digital budgets are still appearing.
Latin America, Middle East, Africa – Mixed / emerging
Significant pockets of growth, but budgets are more volatile and currency risk is higher.
Digital adoption can be advanced in specific markets (e.g., social-heavy countries) but infrastructure and measurement often lag.
By capability stack
1. Early-stage marketing maturity (often SMB brands, some emerging regions)
Characteristics:
Fragmented tools, basic web analytics, limited experimentation.
Heavy reliance on a single channel (usually search, Meta, or local social).
Digital >70–80% of media; sophisticated measurement (MMM, MTA, lift tests).
Heavy investment in AI for targeting, creative, and optimization. (Reuters, Reuters)
Opportunity:
Shift from “more channels” to better orchestration, algorithm-friendly creative, and owned data/identity.
This is where we see large mergers and restructures (Omnicom–IPG, WPP’s strategic review) aimed at funding AI and data platforms.(Business Insider, The Guardian, Financial Times)
Industry Digital Ad Spend Over Time
Industry Digital Ad Spend Over Time (US Digital Ad Revenue)
Trend read: After the 2021 surge, growth moderated in 2022–2023, then re-accelerated in 2024 to
+14.9% YoY, driven by Search, Retail Media, and Digital Video/CTV.
Linear TV, OOH, print, radio, sponsorships—still relevant in reach-heavy verticals.
25%
This blended view aligns with surveys showing digital now represents
~60–75% of marketing budgets
in mature markets, with growth concentrated in Search, Retail Media, Social/Creators, and CTV.
3. Audience & Buyer Behavior Insights
This section focuses on the buyers of Advertising & Marketing Services (CMOs, growth leaders, e-commerce heads, founders, etc.) and how their expectations and decision journeys are changing in 2024–2025. Where consumer data is relevant—especially around privacy and personalization—it’s included because it shapes how these buyers think about the solutions they purchase.
Ideal Customer Profiles (ICP) for Advertising & Marketing Services
Most providers in this sector end up selling into some version of the following ICPs. You can adapt or narrow these for your own positioning.
Held accountable for profitable growth and brand health, not just volume metrics.
Dealing with internal silos (brand vs performance, global vs local, product vs central).
What they want from providers
Strategy + execution in the same ecosystem: not just slideware, not just media trading.
Demonstrable impact on incremental revenue, market share, and customer lifetime value (LTV).
Confidence that agencies can handle complexity (data governance, privacy, markets, local regulations).
Selection signal
Strong preference for vendors who show category fluency (“we understand your retail / financial / SaaS context”) and operating proof (case studies, pilots, references).
ICP 2 – High-Growth Digital-First & DTC Brands
Who they are
Founder/CEO, VP Growth, Head of Performance, E-commerce lead.
Revenue range often $20–200M, but with high growth expectations and venture or PE backing.
Context & pressures
Razor-thin margins due to paid media costs, logistics, and discounts.
Aggressive targets on CAC payback windows (e.g., 6–12 months) and contribution margin.
Constant experimentation across Meta, TikTok, Google, Amazon/e-retailers, affiliates, and creator partnerships.
What they want from providers
Performance-obsessed, test-heavy execution with clear hypotheses and fast learning cycles.
Creative and offer iteration that can keep pace with platform trends (UGC, short-form video, creator whitelisting).
Tight feedback loops tying channel performance to unit economics and inventory.
Selection signal
Bias toward agencies who show platform-native expertise and can bring playbooks + dashboards rather than generic recommendations.
CMO, VP Demand Gen, VP Revenue Marketing, CPO/Founder in smaller orgs, plus Sales and RevOps leadership in the buying group.
Context & pressures
Longer and more complex sales cycles, with buying groups of 6–10 stakeholders across IT, finance, security, operations and business lines (this is consistent with well-documented B2B buying research).
Pipeline goals tied to ARR, net retention (NRR), and product expansion, not just lead counts.
Very conscious of wasted MQL spend and “junk leads” that don’t become opportunities.
What they want from providers
Smart integration of brand storytelling with demand-generation engines (paid, content, ABM).
Ability to orchestrate role-based journeys across web, email, sales enablement, and events.
Reporting that speaks the language of pipeline, win rates, deal cycles, and NRR, not just impressions and clicks.
CMOs, communications heads, digital leaders, compliance counterparts.
Context & pressures
Operate under strict compliance, risk, and approval frameworks.
Brand trust and reputation management are as critical as performance metrics.
What they want from providers
Partners who understand regulatory constraints and can still deliver efficient, compliant performance tactics.
Strong crisis and reputation capabilities alongside acquisition and retention strategies.
Demographic, Firmographic & Psychographic Trends
Firmographic shifts
Budgets are concentrating in fewer, more strategic partners. Many large brands are actively consolidating agencies to simplify governance, improve data sharing, and reduce overlapping fees.
In-house teams have grown significantly since 2020 (in-house agencies are now common among large advertisers), but they increasingly rely on external partners for specialist skills (e.g., retail media, experimentation, AI/ML modeling) and capacity for big campaigns.
Psychographic traits of modern marketing-buyers
Across ICPs, decision makers share a few common traits:
Data-skeptical, not data-blind.
They have lived through years of dashboards with conflicting attribution stories.
They respond better to transparent methodology (e.g., lift experiments, mixed-model outputs) than “black-box AI.”
Outcome-oriented but risk-averse.
They have to justify spend to boards/CFOs; even risk-tolerant marketers want controlled tests, pilots, and step-wise scaling instead of “big bang” bets.
Experience-driven internally.
B2B and enterprise buyers themselves expect consumer-grade UX in the buying process: clear content, self-serve pricing info where possible, and frictionless access to experts.
Slow, opaque proposal processes or generic decks are immediate red flags.
Hybrid work expectations.
Many buyers are operating in remote or hybrid teams, which makes asynchronous communication, shared dashboards, and collaborative planning tools even more important. Offerings that assume constant in-person workshops can feel outdated.
Buyer Journey Mapping (Online vs. Offline)
A realistic buyer journey for marketing services is multi-touch and multi-stakeholder. You can think about it through five broad stages.
Stage 1 – Problem Framing & Trigger
Typical triggers
Performance gap (CAC is too high, ROAS falls, new product underperforms).
Strategic shift (new market, rebrand, channel expansion like retail media or CTV).
Capacity issue (internal team can’t keep up with volume or specialization needs).
Where it happens
Mostly online / internal, via performance dashboards, board feedback, or internal reviews.
Buyers perform generic research (“best B2B demand gen agency”, “retail media agency”, “creative & media agency,” etc.), look at analyst reports, rankings, marketplaces and seek peer recommendations.
Social platforms (LinkedIn, X, YouTube, podcasts) are key idea sources; buyers often vet thought leaders and case-study content before they ever visit a vendor site.
LinkedIn posts and long-form threads from founders, strategists, and specialists.
Conference talks, webinars and recorded panels.
Key requirement
At this stage, buyers are not ready for aggressive sales; they want education and perspective. Vendors who offer benchmarks, diagnostic tools, or POV reports tend to get saved to the longlist.
Stage 3 – Shortlist & Consensus Building
Buying group dynamics
The decision usually involves marketing, finance, procurement, and sometimes IT or legal/compliance.
Research consistently shows that B2B buying groups often include 6–10 active stakeholders and that a majority of deals stall because groups can’t reach consensus.
Offline: reference calls, internal meetings to discuss options, workshops with candidates.
Pain points
Confusion over how agencies differ (“everyone says they’re data-driven, integrated, and customer-centric”).
Difficulty comparing pricing models and scopes (retainer vs. performance fees vs. project-based).
Stage 4 – Evaluation, Pilots & Commercials
Evaluation pattern
Many buyers now prefer pilot engagements or phased scopes: for instance, a 90-day experimentation sprint, a single-channel mandate (like paid search or CTV), or a strategic diagnostic before committing to multi-year AOR.
They look for measurable outcomes even in pilots (lift in lead quality, improvement in CAC, incremental revenue).
Decision drivers
Specific category case studies, benchmarks against peers, and demonstrations of how the team works day-to-day (ways of working, governance, tool stack).
For complex accounts: ability to integrate with existing martech (CRM, CDP, analytics) and data-governance requirements.
Stage 5 – Onboarding, Delivery & Expansion
Onboarding expectations
Clear 90-day plan, with defined experiments, communication rhythm, reporting cadences, and decision gates.
Fast access to core people, not just senior leadership who appeared in the pitch.
Expansion
If the partner proves themselves in one scope (e.g., performance media), buyers are open to cross-selling into creative, lifecycle, or analytics—but only with evidence of capability, not just relationship goodwill.
Shifts in Expectations: Privacy, Personalization, Speed & Transparency
Privacy & Data Use
Buyers are reacting to both regulation and consumer sentiment:
Major platforms have shifted toward privacy-centric models (consent management, limited third-party cookies, new targeting frameworks).
Consumers express ambivalence about personalization: many say they want it, but a large share finds current personalization efforts “creepy,” invasive, or simply inaccurate.
What this means for buyers:
They want partners who can build robust first-party data strategies (consented data, clean rooms, identity resolution, loyalty programs).
Vendors must explain exactly how data is used and protected, not just tout “AI-powered targeting.”
Personalization & Relevance
Marketers are moving from static personas to dynamic segments based on real behavior (events, transactions, engagement patterns).
However, they are wary of over-personalization that feels intrusive or fragile; they now seek:
Contextual and situational relevance (where/when/how the message appears) more than overly granular profile-based targeting.
Guardrails: frequency caps, content safety, brand suitability filters.
For service providers, this translates into demand for journey design and orchestration, not just audience lists.
Speed & Experimentation
Buyers have become accustomed to rapid releases in their own products, which sets expectations for marketing:
Weekly or bi-weekly test cycles rather than quarterly campaigns.
Ability to launch new creative variants or experiments in days, not weeks or months.
Agencies that require long lead times for planning and approvals are perceived as misaligned with reality.
Transparency & Measurement
After years of fuzzy attribution and walled gardens, there is a strong preference for:
Incrementality tests (geo-tests, holdout groups, experiments) over single-source attribution claims.
Clear reporting frameworks tied to business outcomes (revenue, LTV, NRR), not just media metrics.
Buyers expect to see how decisions are made—which levers you pull when performance dips, which metrics matter at which stages of the funnel.
Persona Snapshot
Persona Snapshot — Buyers of Advertising & Marketing Services
Practical buying-group roles, goals, fears, and the content signals that move them through evaluation.
Persona
Role & Context
Main Goals
Top Fears
What They Look For in Content
Strategic CMO / VP Brand & Growth
Owns brand health, pipeline, and often P&L; manages multi-channel & multi-market spend.
EnterpriseOmnichannel
Grow revenue & market share while protecting brand trust; balance long-term equity with short-term results.
Non-incremental spend, brand safety risk, fragmented data, and partners who can’t scale globally.
Typical B2B-style buying path from initial trigger through long-term expansion. Stages narrow toward conversion and retention.
1
Trigger / Need
A performance gap, growth mandate, rebrand, market entry, or capacity shortfall creates urgency.
2
Discovery & Longlist
Buyers research options via search, peer referrals, social/POD thought leaders, and analyst lists. POV content matters most.
3
Shortlist & Consensus
Buying groups (marketing + finance + procurement + IT) align; vendors are compared on category proof and fit.
4
Pilot / Evaluation
A phased scope or 60–90 day pilot tests lift, workflow, and integration. Incrementality evidence drives the decision.
5
Onboarding & Expansion
First 90 days set cadence, experimentation velocity, and reporting. Successful pilots expand into multi-channel mandates.
Use this flow to map content and proof assets: benchmarks & POV early, case studies mid-funnel, pilots & roadmaps late-funnel, and lifecycle reporting post-sale.
4. Channel Performance Breakdown
This section evaluates major acquisition and retention channels used by Advertising & Marketing Services firms to win clients (brands, advertisers, other businesses). Benchmarks are latest cross-industry and B2B-services proxies where public sector-only data isn’t available; I call out how the marketing-services vertical typically over/under-indexes.
What “good” looks like in 2025 (macro view)
The channel mix that wins in this sector is usually hybrid:
This mirrors where spend growth is actually happening: Search, Digital Video/CTV, Social/Creators, and Retail/Commerce media are the fastest-growing pools of budget.
Channel benchmarks & economics table (2025)
Notes on CAC: CAC for agencies varies massively by niche and deal size. The ranges below represent typical observed outcomes for B2B services selling mid-market/enterprise contracts (not small local shops).
Benchmarks use latest cross-industry/B2B services proxies where sector-only data isn’t public.
CAC ranges reflect mid-market and enterprise-leaning agency deals.
Channel
Avg. CPC
Conv. Rate*
Typical CAC
Comments
Paid Search (Google/Microsoft)
$5–$12+ for agency keywords Proxy avg: $5.26
5–10% LP CVR common Proxy avg: 7.5%
$300–$1,500 / SQL
Highest intent + most auction-inflated. Wins depend on proof-rich ads/LPs and tight SQL optimization.
SEO / Content
—
2–5% site CVR typical
Lowest blended CAC over time
Slow ramp, high compounding ROI. Zero-click SERPs require POV, original data, and distribution-first publishing.
Email / Lifecycle
—
Opens ~39–42% CTR ~2.0–2.2%
$20–$80 / re-engaged lead
Best retention + nurture ROI. Triggered persona streams outperform newsletters for buying-group consensus.
Paid Social (Meta)
$0.80–$3.50 typical
1–3% click→lead
$400–$2,000+
Strong for retargeting and narrative sequencing; cold lead gen can be costly in senior-buyer audiences.
TikTok / Creator Ads
Lower CPC vs Meta (varies)
Creative-dependent; ~1–2% typical
Competitive in Gen Z / innovation segments
Spark Ads + UGC explainers outperform polished spots. Great for demand creation, then capture on search.
LinkedIn (B2B / ABM)
Highest social CPC (2–5× Meta)
1–4% lead CVR
Premium CAC, ACV-justified
Best for buying-group penetration, exec targeting, ABM, and event funnels; document ads perform well.
Digital Video / CTV
CPM-based
Lower direct CVR; high assist lift
Depends on capture layer
Completion rates often 90–98%. Strong top-funnel attention; measure via lift + CAPIs.
Retail / Commerce Media
Varies by retailer
High lower-funnel CVR
Efficient where commerce data exists
Most relevant for agencies serving retail/CPG/marketplace sellers; fastest budget-shift area.
Events / Webinars
—
20–45% attendee→MQL
Low CAC if partner-led
Still a top B2B services closer, especially paired with ABM follow-up and role-based content.
*Conversion rate refers to landing-page click→lead/action unless noted.
Use SQL-based goals wherever possible to avoid inflated MQL volume.
*Conversion rate here refers to landing-page conversion from click to lead/action, unless otherwise stated.
Channel-by-channel strategic read-out
Paid Search (Google / Microsoft)
Why it wins:
It captures explicit intent when buyers are already in “shop mode” (e.g., “best B2B demand gen agency,” “retail media agency,” “CTV measurement partner”).
Search continues to be the largest digital pool; growth remains strong.
2025 performance reality:
Expensive and crowded in the marketing-services vertical. You’re rarely competing on bid alone—you’re competing on proof and specificity.
Best-performing tactics:
Category-named campaigns (retail media, creator ROI, CTV performance) rather than generic “agency” terms.
Landing pages built as proof hubs: benchmark → case study → methodology → consult.
Tightly scoped conversion events (SQL not MQL) to train smart bidding.
SEO / Content
Why it wins:
Long-run CAC advantage when markets are auction-inflated.
Buyers start discovery online; they save POV assets early.
2025 constraints:
Zero-click search and AI summaries reduce traffic for commodity content.
Email: open and click rate by persona stream; reply/meeting rate for nurture.
CTV/Video: completion rate, reach vs frequency, search/web-lift deltas.
SEO: impression growth in high-intent clusters, assisted conversions, share of voice vs top competitors.
Stacked Bar Chart: % of Budget Allocation
5. Top Tools & Platforms by Sector
The Advertising & Marketing Services sector runs on a stack-of-stacks: agencies and service firms must operate their own internal martech plus integrate with client stacks (often multiple per account). In 2025, the tool landscape is expanding while simultaneously consolidating around a few “centers of gravity.”
Core Stack Categories in 2025 (what most firms actually use)
1) CRM + Marketing Automation (the stack “center”)
In B2B-heavy orgs, CRM or MAP remains the system-of-record and stack hub. This did not materially change from 2024 to 2025, even as AI tools exploded.
The winning pattern is AI anchored to the hub, not replacing it. Mature teams add AI copilots and agent workflows on top of existing CRM/MAP.
Platform momentum: Salesforce’s AI products (including Agentforce) are scaling quickly in enterprise, showing client appetite for embedded AI in CRM workflows.
2) Analytics + Measurement Layer
Standard baseline: GA4/Adobe Analytics + BI (Looker/Power BI/Tableau) + media platform reporting.
More advanced measurement: MMM, incrementality testing, and experimentation suites tied into the data layer.
This layer is increasingly where agencies differentiate—clients want transparent causal proof instead of black-box attribution.
3) Data Layer: CDP / Customer Data Warehouse / Identity
2025 stack architecture trends emphasize warehouse-native or composable CDPs that sit on top of Snowflake/BigQuery/Databricks rather than isolated CDPs.
Gartner’s 2025 CDP market shows leaders shifting; Salesforce and Tealium are positioned as leaders, while several formerly “visionary” or “leader” tools slid into niche/challenger positions. This suggests market maturity + consolidation pressure.
4) Media Activation & Optimization
Always-on suite across: Google Ads, Microsoft Ads, Meta, TikTok, LinkedIn, retail media portals, and programmatic DSPs.
Agencies increasingly plug optimization into internal experimentation and creative pipelines to close the loop between creative → media → outcome.
5) Creative Production + Content Ops
Traditional creative suites remain, but AI-assisted creative tooling is now standard for ideation, variant generation, and format adaptation.
In 2025, the tool landscape is still growing in count (15,384 martech tools listed), but growth is AI-skewed and heavily redundant.
What’s gaining share in 2025 (by capability)
A) AI embedded inside core platforms (vs. stand-alone)
The State of Martech 2025 survey highlights rapid adoption of built-in AI assistants inside martech products and workflows that directly connect to CRM/MAP and data warehouses.
Why it’s winning:
reduces tool sprawl,
keeps data centralized,
allows governance and auditing.
B) Warehouse-native personalization and orchestration
Martech architecture is shifting toward composable stacks that run personalization, segmentation, and analytics directly off a shared warehouse.
For agencies, this improves speed of experimentation and makes client integrations less painful.
C) Data clean rooms / privacy-safe collaboration
Adoption has moved from “emerging” to mainstream in B2C: Forrester reports ~90% of B2C marketers already use clean rooms for marketing use cases.
Agencies are increasingly expected to operate or co-manage clean room workflows for clients, especially in retail media, CTV, and cross-publisher measurement.
D) Identity resolution & first-party data scaling
Privacy uncertainty and walled gardens keep pushing demand toward identity graphs, consented data enrichment, and partner data collaboration.
Large holding companies buying identity assets (e.g., recent industry moves) signal that data ownership is now a strategic moat, not a support function.
E) Low-code / no-code workflow automation
AI-powered low-code marketing apps are rising because they:
shorten build cycles for landing pages, journeys, and experiments,
reduce reliance on scarce engineering resources.
What’s losing share (or being squeezed)
1) Stand-alone point solutions without data gravity
Tools that don’t integrate cleanly with CRM/MAP or warehouse layers are falling out of favor. The State of Martech narrative in 2025 is “convergence, not chaos.”
Buyers tolerate new tools only if they directly improve throughput (creative velocity, segmentation accuracy, lift testing).
2) Legacy CDPs with high cost / low flexibility
Gartner MQ shifts suggest some big-name CDPs are being reevaluated as composable alternatives mature.
In practice, agencies report CDP success when:
data is already clean,
ownership is clear,
activation is built into workflows.
3) “AI content mills” and generic generators
High-volume, low-differentiation AI writing/image tools are being replaced by:
embedded AI in platforms,
tools wired to first-party data,
creative systems with human review and testing gates.
Key integrations that matter most right now
Across agencies and marketing-service firms, the most valuable integrations are the ones that support end-to-end experimentation:
CRM/MAP ↔ Warehouse/CDP ↔ Ad Platforms
Enables closed-loop lifecycle tracking and smarter audience suppression/expansion.
Creative systems ↔ Performance data
Links ad variants to real contribution margins or pipeline → creative as an optimization lever, not just “output.”
Clean rooms ↔ Retail/CTV ecosystems ↔ MMM
Allows privacy-safe match rates, incrementality validation, and multi-partner measurement.
Toolscape Quadrant (Adoption vs. Satisfaction)
6. Creative & Messaging Trends
Creative is the biggest performance lever in 2025 for Advertising & Marketing Services firms. With auction costs rising and platforms standardizing targeting, what you say and how you say it now drives a disproportionate share of lift. This sector is also unique because your buyers are marketers themselves—so creative needs to be more evidence-based, more transparent, and more technically credible than in most industries.
What’s materially different in 2025
1) Creative “does the targeting.” Platforms have become better at finding users, but they rely on signal-rich creative to know who should respond and why. This is especially true on Meta, TikTok, YouTube, and CTV, where broad targeting + creative specificity outperforms narrow targeting with generic ads.
2) Proof beats polish. Marketing services buyers are extremely ad-literate. They’ve seen every generic claim. So the best work is usually:
data-anchored,
specific to category and problem,
transparent about methodology and tradeoffs.
3) Funnels are now multi-format narratives. Instead of “one hero ad,” winning campaigns deliver a storyline across assets:
Hook → POV → Benchmark → Case study → Pilot offer This sequencing matches buying-group reality and reduces late-funnel stalls.
Best-performing CTAs, hooks, and messaging types
A) CTAs that convert in this sector
High-performing CTA patterns (2025):
Benchmark / diagnostic CTAs
“Run your CAC benchmark”
“Audit your funnel in 15 minutes”
“Get a retail media readiness score”
Why it works: buyers want context before commitment.
Pilot-first CTAs
“Start with a 90-day lift sprint”
“Test one channel with us”
Why it works: reduces risk for buying groups and aligns with pilot preference in B2B services.
Proof-artifact CTAs
“See the teardown”
“Watch the playbook in action”
“Download the experiment plan”
Why it works: tangible evidence over promises.
Role-specific CTAs
CFO lens: “Model your CAC payback”
Performance lens: “Steal our testing cadence”
CMO lens: “See brand + performance lift together”
Why it works: buying groups need different proof.
B) Hooks that consistently win
The hook patterns that outperform in 2025:
Contrarian truth: “Your ROAS is lying (here’s why).”
Specific outcome: “How we cut CAC 22% for a marketplace brand in 60 days.”
Benchmark curiosity: “What top SaaS brands pay for LinkedIn leads in 2025.”
Teardown/learning: “Why this ad worked (and what most brands miss).”
System reveal: “Our 5-step CTV → Search demand capture loop.”
Underlying psychology: Buyers don’t need persuasion that marketing matters. They need persuasion that you are different, with a method they can trust.
Emerging creative formats
1) UGC + creator-style ads everywhere
UGC/creator formats now dominate TikTok, Reels, Shorts, and are increasingly used in LinkedIn B2B and CTV cutdowns.
Even enterprise buyers respond to ads that feel operator-led, not brand-scripted.
What works within UGC:
Teardowns filmed by real strategists
“3 things we found in your funnel”
Live experiment results (“we tested 5 hooks—here’s the winner”)
2) Short-form video as the default unit
The strongest agencies now design campaigns as short-form first, then expand upwards into longer video, carousels, and CTV.
Short-form wins because it compresses:
hook,
insight,
social proof,
CTA.
3) Carousels and document ads (especially on LinkedIn)
Document ads are high-signal mid-funnel units:
benchmarks,
POV decks,
teardown slides,
“before/after” frameworks.
4) Interactive / calculator-based assets
Lightweight tools (benchmarks, readiness scores, ROI calculators) are performing extremely well because they:
capture first-party data,
create value before the sale,
arm buyers for internal consensus.
Sector-specific messaging insights
Advertising & Marketing Services firms sell capability + trust + outcomes. Messaging that wins in 2025 typically leans on one or more of these narratives:
Four proven asset formats that consistently drive attention, credibility, and mid-to-late funnel conversion.
1
Benchmark Graphic + POV
Lead with one sharp stat or chart (CAC, CPC inflation, spend mix).
Add a short POV: what it means and why peers are missing it.
Include one actionable fix or test idea.
CTA: Download benchmark / Run audit
2
Operator Selfie Video (30–45s)
Open with a 1–2 second hook (contrarian truth or outcome).
Run a 3-step teardown: problem → insight → fix.
Show a proof point (before/after number or lift screenshot).
CTA: Start pilot / Get benchmark
3
Case-Study Carousel
Slide 1–2: the business problem and constraint.
Slide 3: what changed (creative, audience, offer, channel mix).
Slide 4: before/after metrics with timeframe.
Slide 5: why it worked + portable framework.
CTA: Steal the framework
4
Experiment Diary Timeline
Show week-by-week tests (hooks, offers, LP variants, channels).
Highlight learnings and decision gates, not just wins.
End with a lift summary and next-step playbook.
CTA: Replicate the system
Use these archetypes as a sequenced funnel: Benchmark → Selfie POV → Carousel proof → Experiment diary for scale.
Best-Performing Ad Headline Formats
Best-Performing Ad Headline Formats (2025)
High-converting headline structures used by Advertising & Marketing Services firms across paid social, search, and video.
Headline / Hook Format
Example
Why It Performs
Outcome + Timeframe
“Cut CAC 18% in 45 days for a retail marketplace.”
Concrete, falsifiable, and credible. Buyers respond to specificity over generic promises.
Proof-firstLow-fluff
Benchmark Curiosity
“2025 LinkedIn CPL benchmarks by SaaS tier.”
Triggers saving/sharing for internal consensus. Raises authority fast in ad-literate audiences.
AuthoritySave-worthy
Teardown / Learning
“Why this CTV ad made search spike 3×.”
Buyers want to learn, not be sold to. “Explain why it worked” signals real expertise.
EducationalPlatform-native
Contrarian Myth-Busting
“Your ROAS is overstated—here’s how to fix it.”
Cuts through sameness and positions you as a POV-led operator. Strong in mid-funnel.
POVPattern interrupt
System Reveal / Playbook
“Our 6-step creator → search capture engine.”
Signals repeatability and process, not luck. Makes the buyer imagine implementing your method.
RepeatableProcess-led
Risk Reversal / Pilot-First
“Try a 90-day incrementality sprint—no long retainer.”
Lowers buying-group friction and aligns with 2025 preference for phased evaluations.
Low riskPilot-friendly
Tip: Rotate one headline format per creative batch to isolate which hook type is driving lift by channel and audience.
7. Case Studies: Winning Campaigns (Last 12 Months)
Below are three standout campaigns from the past year that exemplify what’s working across Advertising & Marketing Services: proof-led creativity, platform-native execution, and measurable business impact. Each case includes channel mix, goals, results (where public), and why it worked—specifically tied to patterns that agencies and service firms can replicate.
Case Study 1 — Telstra: “Better on a Better Network” (2025)
Category lens: Mass-market brand + performance hybrid, built for attention and measurable perception lift. Why it matters for this sector: It’s a masterclass in high-velocity creative systems (many variants), which is exactly how agencies are now expected to operate in paid social, video, and CTV.
Channel mix & execution
Primary channels:
Broadcast + CTV/streaming around the Paris 2024 Olympics window
Social cutdowns (short-form and snippets)
Strong PR/social amplification from cultural buzz
Creative system:
26 stop-motion micro-films (15 seconds each) showcasing different contexts of network reliability
Humorous, human-first storytelling rather than tech specs
Goal: Reassert network leadership, improve sentiment among non-customers, and convert attention into brand preference during a high-stakes cultural moment.
Results (publicly shared in case materials)
Achieved disproportionate share of voice during the Olympics window.
Outperformed category competitors in positive sentiment, awareness, and “cut-through.”
Tracking indicated stronger perceptions of network superiority, especially among non-customers.
Internal tracking equated the impact to multiple years of sponsorship value compressed into ~4 weeks.
26 variants let Telstra avoid fatigue and match more micro-moments—exactly the playbook agencies should apply to Meta/TikTok/YouTube.
Humor + humanity is back as a performance driver.
Cannes 2025 juries repeatedly emphasized human-centric storytelling and impact over polish or “AI slickness.”
Campaign designed for cultural echo.
The stop-motion aesthetic fueled social sharing, parodies, and earned media—turning paid reach into compounding attention.
Case Study 2 — DoorDash: “DoorDash All The Ads” (2024 → still referenced through 2025)
Category lens: Integrated brand stunt + performance capture. Why it matters for this sector: Shows how a single high-concept moment can reset category positioning while still tying to conversion mechanics.
Channel mix & execution
Anchor moment: Super Bowl integrated campaign.
Primary channels:
National TV + streaming/CTV reach
Social amplification and PR
Search and app-store demand capture tied to the stunt
Mechanic: DoorDash promised to deliver every product advertised during the Super Bowl to one winner, reframing DoorDash as “deliver anything,” not just food.
Goal: Expand brand meaning and drive app engagement without a heavy discount play.
Results (publicly reported)
Campaign became a global reference point and won the Titanium Grand Prix at Cannes Lions 2024, signaling not just creativity but strategy effectiveness.
Significant earned media and conversation lift (widely documented in Cannes case summaries and post-festival analyses).
The idea wasn’t random spectacle; it dramatized DoorDash’s core logistics capability.
Attention → intent → conversion bridge.
Big brand moment created the spike, while search/app capture harvested interest—this “CTV-to-search loop” is a core 2025 playbook.
Repositioning through action, not claim.
DoorDash didn’t say “we deliver anything”—they demonstrated it live. For agencies, this is a strong argument for proof-led messaging.
Case Study 3 — Dove: “Real Beauty” Long-Running Platform (Cannes 2025 Grand Prix)
Category lens: Long-duration brand platform + cultural relevance. Why it matters for this sector: It’s the clearest evidence that consistency + cultural adaptation outperforms constant rebrand churn—especially in an algorithmic world where trust compounds.
Channel mix & execution
Always-on platform spanning:
Social storytelling
Creator/UGC and community movements
Brand film / video
Partnerships and advocacy
Creative strategy: A single positioning (“Real Beauty”) refreshed through current cultural moments over ~20 years.
Goal: Sustain preference and trust while anchoring Dove in a distinct cultural lane.
Results (industry recognition)
Won Cannes Lions 2025 Grand Prix for long-term brand platform/creative strategy. Jurors highlighted this as the “playbook” for durable brand building.
The campaign proves that when a positioning is strong, you don’t need to reinvent it yearly—you need to reinterpret it credibly.
Cultural listening at scale.
Dove stays relevant by plugging into evolving social norms without abandoning core truth.
Trust is a moat in privacy-first marketing.
With targeting constraints rising, brand trust becomes a bigger conversion multiplier. “Real Beauty” is essentially a long-term trust engine.
Campaign Card Template: Before/After Metrics and Creative Used
Campaign Card Template
Creative Used
Format(s)
UGC / Carousel / CTV / Static / Other
Hook
____________________________
CTA
____________________________
Variant Count
____
Tip: note whether variants were angle-based (hooks) or format-based (UGC vs carousel vs video).
Before / After Metrics
Primary KPI
____________________________
Before
____
After
____
Lift %
____%
Window
____ days/weeks
Secondary KPI
____________________________
Before / After
____ → ____
Prefer incrementality or lift-test evidence over last-click attribution if available.
Use one card per campaign/experiment. Over time, these cards become a searchable internal playbook of repeatable winners.
8. Marketing KPIs & Benchmarks by Funnel Stage
This section translates sector-level performance into funnel-stage benchmarks you can use to evaluate campaigns in Advertising & Marketing Services (agencies, marketing service providers, adtech/martech vendors, consultancies). Because offerings span B2B retainers, project work, and hybrid B2C plays, the most useful benchmarks are ranges plus “industry-high” targets. Where benchmarks come from broader digital datasets, I note the mapping to this sector.
Funnel overview (what “good” looks like in 2025)
Key structural reality for this sector: You are selling expertise and outcomes, usually to buying groups. That means:
Awareness is expensive (CPMs inflated in B2B/exec targeting).
Consideration hinges on credibility artifacts (benchmarks, case studies, POV).
Conversion is less “click to buy,” more “click to consensus.”
Retention/expansion drives LTV (multi-year client relationships are the norm).
Stylized funnel illustrating relative audience narrowing across the buying journey.
Awareness
Consideration
Conversion
Retention
Loyalty / Expansion
For this sector, consensus-building in buying groups typically creates the sharpest narrowing between Consideration and Conversion.
9. Marketing Challenges & Opportunities
The Advertising & Marketing Services sector in 2025 is defined by a paradox: more channels, more automation, more data—but also more noise, higher costs, and more fragile trust. Below is a grounded view of the biggest headwinds and where they create real opportunity.
Rising ad costs & auction compression
What’s happening
CPC and CPM inflation is still real in 2025, driven by platform concentration, saturated auctions, and the shift of budgets into the same “safe” pools (Search, Meta, TikTok, CTV). Multiple benchmark reports show costs rising high-single to double-digit versus early-2020s baselines.
Search cost inflation is especially acute: recent analyses show 2024 CPCs rose more than expected and 2025 is projected to rise again, making demand-capture increasingly expensive without differentiated creative and landing experiences.
Why it’s a challenge for marketing services firms
Agencies and service firms sell into clients who are hyper-aware of media inflation, so “we’ll optimize bids” is not a credible value prop anymore.
Rising costs compress ROAS/CPA, which increases churn risk for agencies that cannot prove incremental value.
Where the opportunity is
Creative as a cost containment lever. Better hooks and proof assets raise CTR/CVR and counteract CPC inflation. In 2025, this is the cleanest path to lowering blended CAC without shrinking scale.
Incrementality + MMM as differentiators. When costs rise, clients care more about what actually caused lift. Agencies that can run testing, MMM, or lift studies become “strategic,” not commodity.
Google has abandoned full third-party cookie deprecation in Chrome, keeping cookies available under user choice rather than a forced phase-out. This reversal ended years of countdown planning.
Even with cookies staying, the ecosystem is still shifting toward:
more consent gating,
more walled-garden measurement,
more first-party / clean-room data collaboration.
Why it’s a challenge
The “cookie-less future” didn’t arrive cleanly—it arrived messily. Marketers now have to operate in a hybrid state:
some third-party data still works,
but regulators and platforms keep tightening permissions.
Clients are confused about what matters now (“Do we still need a first-party plan if cookies stay?”).
Where the opportunity is
First-party data and identity still win. Cookie reversal doesn’t restore cross-site visibility the way it used to. Agencies that build consented data strategies (CRM enrichment, lifecycle capture, server-side tracking) remain ahead.
Privacy-safe measurement services. Clean rooms and privacy-safe matching are becoming baseline expectations for large brands; agencies that can run them gain durable retainers.
AI’s role in content & personalization: huge upside, messy reality
What’s happening
AI is fully mainstream, but implementation maturity is lagging. A 2025 survey of 500+ marketers found that 56% use AI in isolated/ad-hoc ways and 51% can’t track its ROI, meaning most teams are still experimenting without operationalizing results.
Users increasingly expect non-generic, personalized AI output; power users want AI that adapts to brand/org style and context.
Large agency networks are responding by launching in-house AI platforms for clients (e.g., WPP Open Pro) to scale production and reduce cost-to-serve.
Why it’s a challenge
AI increases volume faster than quality. Output floods channels unless governed by strategy and testing.
Clients start asking: “If AI makes ads cheaper to produce in-house, why pay an agency?”
Where the opportunity is
Agencies as AI operators, not AI vendors. Winning firms position AI as part of a repeatable growth system:
rapid creative iteration,
experiment design,
measurement,
brand consistency guardrails.
Human + AI hybrid creative. Case evidence shows AI can automate large portions of marketing ops, but human POV, empathy, and storytelling remain the differentiator when breaking through saturation.
AI-driven personalization done safely. The opportunity isn’t “more personalization,” it’s better personalization—cross-functional, aligned to product and trust.
Organic reach decay & attention scarcity
What’s happening
Organic reach has continued to decline across major social platforms due to algorithm shifts, saturation, and monetization. Recent 2025 summaries note structurally lower organic visibility and more pay-to-play dynamics.
Why it’s a challenge
Agencies that rely heavily on organic social for acquisition see unstable pipelines.
Clients increasingly demand paid + owned + creator ecosystems rather than “posting more.”
Where the opportunity is
Creator/UGC ecosystems to reclaim organic distribution. Creator content is algorithm-native and often bypasses brand-page decline.
“Attention-first” creative strategy. Organic isn’t dead; generic organic is dead. POV-driven, useful, surprising content still earns reach—especially in short-form.
Qualitative mapping of sector headwinds vs. upside. Axes use a 0–10 scale (low → high).
High risk / high opportunity
High risk / lower opportunity
Lower risk / high opportunity
Lower risk / lower opportunity
Use this quadrant to prioritize 2025 investments: protect against high-risk shifts (AI, privacy) while doubling down on low-risk, high-upside levers (creative systems, incrementality).
Disclaimer: The information on this page is provided by Marketer.co for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, tax, or professional advice, nor an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security, instrument, or investment strategy. All content, including statistics, commentary, forecasts, and analyses, is generic in nature, may not be accurate, complete, or current, and should not be relied upon without consulting your own financial, legal, and tax advisers. Investing in financial services, fintech ventures, or related instruments involves significant risks—including market, liquidity, regulatory, business, and technology risks—and may result in the loss of principal. Marketer.co does not act as your broker, adviser, or fiduciary unless expressly agreed in writing, and assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or losses arising from use of this content. Any forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and actual outcomes may differ materially. References or links to third-party sites and data are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement or responsibility. Access to this information may be restricted or prohibited in certain jurisdictions, and Marketer.co may modify or remove content at any time without notice.
Author
Samuel Edwards
Chief Marketing Officer
Throughout his extensive 10+ year journey as a digital marketer, Sam has left an indelible mark on both small businesses and Fortune 500 enterprises alike. His portfolio boasts collaborations with esteemed entities such as NASDAQ OMX, eBay, Duncan Hines, Drew Barrymore, Price Benowitz LLP, a prominent law firm based in Washington, DC, and the esteemed human rights organization Amnesty International. In his role as a technical SEO and digital marketing strategist, Sam takes the helm of all paid and organic operations teams, steering client SEO services, link building initiatives, and white label digital marketing partnerships to unparalleled success. An esteemed thought leader in the industry, Sam is a recurring speaker at the esteemed Search Marketing Expo conference series and has graced the TEDx stage with his insights. Today, he channels his expertise into direct collaboration with high-end clients spanning diverse verticals, where he meticulously crafts strategies to optimize on and off-site SEO ROI through the seamless integration of content marketing and link building.
%201.svg){kind=logo}
.svg)
